Answer:
Supreme Court justices need a healthy respect for past precedents. But sometimes, precedent is so bad it simply has to be overturned.
The court did just that last month in the case of Knick v. Township of Scott. The court delivered a victory for champions of property rights by overturning a 1985 precedent that had blocked property rights cases from federal courts.
This overturning of an older decision sparked a vigorous public debate. Two Supreme Court justices staked out opposing positions: Elena Kagan warned against a rush to overturn precedents, while Clarence Thomas suggested older decisions that are in fact wrong should be changed.
We should welcome this debate because it highlights the judiciary’s duty to correct its own mistakes and to ensure that our constitutional rights are properly and fully protected.
Answer:
The court of oregon.
Explanation:
Since ricky issueing margie, the court would most likely be in his state.
The first numerical restrictions on the number of immigrants who might enter the United States were set by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921. The National Origins Act of 1924, commonly known as the Immigration Act, strengthened and made the quotas permanent.
The Emergency Quota Act, also known as the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921, the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, the Per Centum Law, and the Johnson Quota Act, was passed primarily in response to the large influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. It was successful in limiting both those immigrants' immigration as well as the immigration of other individuals who were deemed to be "undesirables" to the United States. Although only intended to be temporary, the legislation "proved, in the long run, the most important turning-point in American immigration policy" because it added two new components to American immigration law: numerical limits on immigration and the use of a quota system to determine those limits, which became known as the National Origins Formula.
Learn more about Quota Act from
brainly.com/question/3458702
#SPJ4
The vehicle that is first to arrive and furthest to the right is the one that has the right of way.
<h3>The right of way</h3>
This is a phrase that is used to refer to the party that has the direct usage of the road in certain intersections.
The car that was the first to get to the intersection is the one that would have the right of way in this question.
Read more on right of way here:
brainly.com/question/12361013
<u><em>The answer is:</em></u>
<h2>
A. The mtDNA database.</h2>
