1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
2 years ago
11

PLEASEE HELP.!! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST.!! *EXTRA POINTS* DONT SKIP:((

Mathematics
2 answers:
UNO [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

(3, 2)

(9, 10)

\frac{10 - 2}{9 - 3}

8/6 = 4/3

Grace [21]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

- take two easy points like ( 6, 6 ) and ( 3 , 2 ) in this case

- (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

replace the values into a calculator and you'll get 4/3!

You might be interested in
A parallelogram has a length of 6 centimeters and a width of 4.5 centimeters. This parallelogram is dilated by a scale factor of
Arada [10]
Scale factor is given by:
(length of larger figure)/(length of smaller figure)=(width of larger figure)/(width of the smaller figure)=3.4
The length of the larger figure will be given by:
length=(scale factor)*(length of smaller figure)
=3.4*6=20.4 cm
width of the larger figure will be given by:
width=(scale factor)*(width of smaller figure)
=3.4*4.5
=15.3 cm
Therefore the dimension of the new parallelogram will be 20.4 cm by 15.3 cm
 
3 0
3 years ago
6 less than the product of 3 and a number x
zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

3x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Total area of the shape.
ryzh [129]
5 x 4= 20
8 x 2 = 16
36 + 2 + 2 = 40
40 square inches
7 0
2 years ago
Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed
zalisa [80]

Answer:

Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.

But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.

The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation

8 0
1 year ago
What is the equation of the line that is parallel to the line 5x + 2y = 12 and passes through the point (−2, 4)? y = – x – 1y =
Firlakuza [10]
The equation of the line parallel to 5x+2y=12 and passes through the point (-2, 4) is equal to y= -5/2x - 1
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Solve the compound inequality 8x>or=-64 and 10x<60
    14·1 answer
  • Which expression is equal to (x+2)(−3x2+3x+1)?
    14·1 answer
  • James is participating in a 5-mike walk to raise money for a charity. He has received $300 in fixed pledges and raises $11 extra
    11·1 answer
  • Icon" to view the SpeechStream® loolbar article for
    6·1 answer
  • Bill green, a storm-door salesman, sold $5000 worth of doors and received a commission of $400. What was his rate of commission?
    15·1 answer
  • I don’t know... please help
    11·2 answers
  • The population of a city is 490,000 and is increasing at a rate of 2.75% each year. Approximately when
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer this question please answer it correctly and please show work please I need it please
    7·1 answer
  • 3(x+3)-5x simplify<br> Answer
    8·2 answers
  • Simplify 3²×5² what is the answer​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!