I confused ,I'm not sure how to solve this
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
By the Central Limit Theorem, both would be approximately normal and have the same mean. The difference is in the standard deviation, since as the sample size increases, the standard deviation decreases. So the SRS of 600 would have a smaller standard deviation than the SRS of 200.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean and standard deviation
, the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean
and standard deviation
.
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
For the sampling distribution of size n of a sample proportion p, the mean is p and the standard deviation is
Differences between SRS of 200 and of 600
By the Central Limit Theorem, both would be approximately normal and have the same mean. The difference is in the standard deviation, since as the sample size increases, the standard deviation decreases. So the SRS of 600 would have a smaller standard deviation than the SRS of 200.
We will have the following:
Using exponential regression we will have that the line of best fit will be:
Now, we will have that:
So, the approximation using linear regression gives us as solution approximately 29.7 years; thus the closest one to match is then