Answer:
Proactive interference.
Explanation:
What the exercise is exemplifying about is "Proactive interference" which is, as it's name indicates, an interference of our memory. When we are looking for a particular word, moment, etc., using our memory, sometimes we find a newer memory that intereferes, that confuses us for a moment. This is what is called proactive interference, and a very good example of that is what occurs to Deanna: she studied Spanish in high school and now, probably years later, she studies French. But, when attempting to do so, she confuses some words with Spanish words.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
The Coase Theorem also states that when conflicting property rights occur, bargaining between the parties involved will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of which party is ultimately awarded the property rights, as long as the transaction costs associated with bargaining are negligible. If trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights.
Answer:
US fire administration
Explanation:
In 1974, Congress approved the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act to bring an end to the losses incurred by the fire. U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) and the National Fire Academy (NFA) were created under this act. Many actions were taken to save lives and property from destruction. The act has helped in the reduction of deaths caused by fire and prevention of property.
Answer:
The correct answer is - option B. Whether the Twitter user provided #SorrySorrySorry (for the sincere condition), #SorryNotSorry (for the insincere condition), or #WhatsDoneIsDone (for the no apology condition).
Explanation:
An independent variable is a variable in any experiment is that leads to the changes to the dependent variable. The independent variables are subject to change to know what changes occur to the experiment.
The independent variables are stand-alone in specific conditions and would not change by the other variables the investigator tries to analyze. In this case, the Twitter user provided three different hashtags for three different conditions.
Personal opinions:
“Always made good decisions”
“He was smart to stay out of the war”
“Probably couldn’t handle it”
Loaded language:
Good
Refused
Smart
I don’t see any examples of first or second person pronouns.
