Answer:
271 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
15.95+0.92 x=265.27
0.92 x=265.27-15.95
.92 x=249.32
x=24932/92=271
Answer: x^2+5x+6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
d. 16,092
Step-by-step explanation:
Staples: 1452 x 9 = 13,068
Office Depot: 504 x 6 = 3,024
13,068 + 3,024 = 16,092
Answer:
1. a. Weak
2. r^2=0.0169
The variation in the price of the wine explained by the variation in the weight of the bottle is 1.69%.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation between the weight of the wine bottles and the price of the wine is r=0.13.
The values for r goes from r=-1, where a perfect negative correlation to r=1 for a perfect positive correlation. The value r=0 indicates no correlation at all.
Then, a value of r close to 0 indicates very weak correlation between the two variables.
The value for r^2 in this case is:

The value of r2 can be interpreted as the proportion of the variation in the dependant variable explained by the independent vairable. In this case, the variation in the price of the wine explained by the variation in the weight of the bottle is 1.69%, which is very close to 0.
Answer: A) 
B) H = 5.10
C) Yes
Step-by-step explanation: <u>Exponential</u> <u>Decay</u> <u>function</u> is a model that describes the reducing of an amount by a constant rate over time. Generally, it is written in the form: 
A) C is initial quantity, in this case, the initial concentration of DDT. To determine r, using the data given:



Using a natural logarithm property called <em>power rule:</em>



The decay function for concentration of DDT through the years is 
B) The value of H is calculated by 


Again, using power rule for logarithm:



H = 5.10
Constant H in the half-life formula is H=5.10
C) Using model
to determine concentration of DDT in 1995:

y(24) = 0.5
By 1995, the concentration of DDT is 0.5 ppm, so using this model is possible to reduce such amount and more of DDT.