Question:
What occurs to the atoms of reactants in a chemical reaction?
Answer:
In a chemical reaction, the atoms and molecules that interact with each other are called reactants. ... No new atoms are created, and no atoms are destroyed. In a chemical reaction, reactants contact each other, bonds between atoms in the reactants are broken, and atoms rearrange and form new bonds to make the products.
Answer:
(a) ₁₉K: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶ 4s¹
(b) ₁₀Ne: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶
---
(a) 3
(b) 6
(c) 7
Explanation:
We can state the ground-state electron configuration for each element following Aufbau's principle.
(a) ₁₉K: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶ 4s¹
(b) ₁₀Ne: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶
Second part
(a) Al belongs to Group 13 in the Periodic Table. It has 13-10=3 electrons in the valence shell.
(b) O belongs to Group 16 in the Periodic Table. It has 16-10=6 electrons in the valence shell.
(c) F belongs to Group 17 in the Periodic Table. It has 17-10=7 electrons in the valence shell.
you let josh do his work on an electronic devices
Answer:
Field experiments can often have the potential to give scientists opportunities that are not possible in a lab setting.
Explanation:
Having people "act natural" in a lab setting is impossible to truly achieve, as we all know what happens to our mental state and behavior when we are being actively observed. This is also especially helpful when conducting wildlife research, as there are a myriad of different things influencing animal and plant behavior that would be nigh impossible to recreate perfectly in a controlled lab setting.
Field research can have its disadvantages as well, as it is very hard to only have one thing change (make an independent variable) in a wild environment with ever-changing weather, social effects, etc. Also, you, as the researcher, as causing an impact on the very location that you are observing, which can alter your results in unpredictable ways.
The thing to remember is that each type of study has its advantages and disadvantages; if they didn't, then we'd all do the same type of research! You have to weigh your research options and figure out which one works best for your situation :)
Answer:
Remove the already produced water and allow the reaction to reach equilibrium again.
Explanation:
<em>According to Le Chatelier principle, when a reaction is in equilibrium and one of the factors that influence the rate of reaction is altered, the equilibrium will shift so as to annul the effects of the change.</em>
If the product is continuously being removed from a reaction that is in equilibrium, more product will continued to be formed in another to annul the effect of reduction in the concentration of product.
Hence, in order to maximize production of water in the reaction, the product (water) needs to be removed and the reaction allowed to reach equilibrium again.
