Answer:
D
Explanation:
Firstly, before we answer this question, we need to know what a futures contract is.
A futures contract can be defined as an agreement specifying the delivery of a commodity or a security at an agreed future date and at a currently agreed price.
This means to set a future contract rolling, we need to have an agreed date if delivery and currently agreed price by both parties involved.
Now, to the question, the correct answer is D. He has the obligation to deliver the underlying financial instrument at the specified future date
If you work after high school, you will be giving up your college education as well as an extra $400,000 over your lifetime. If you go to college, you will miss the work experience after high school, as well as extra money in your pocket early on.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
a)
The present cost of design 1A = 2700000 + 175000/r
The present cost of design 1B = 3800000 + 40000/r
Where r is the rate of return.
At breakeven rate of return, the present cost of both designs would be the same. Hence:
2700000 + 175000/r = 3800000 + 40000/r
3800000 - 2700000 = 175000/r - 40000/r
1100000 = 135000/r
r = 135000 / 1100000 = 0.1227
r = 12.27%
Therefore the breakeven rate of return is 12.27%
b) At an MARR of 10% per year, that is r = 0.1:
The present cost of design 1A = 2700000 + 175000/0.1 = $4.45 million
The present cost of design 1B = 3800000 + 40000/0.1 = $4.2 million
At an MARR of 10% per year, design 1B Correct is preferred because it has the lowest cost.
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help