Answer:
25,26,27, and 28
Step-by-step explanation:
Write consecutive integers as x,x+1,x+2,x+3,x+4, and so forth.
x+x+1+x+2+x+3
---------------------- = 53
2
1) Combine alike terms:
4x+6
------- = 53
2
2) Multiply both sides by 2:
4x+6=106
3) Subtract 6 from both sides:
4x=100
4) Divide both sides by 4:
x=25
5) Plug in 25 for x for all 4 integers:
25
26
27
28
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(1) -5 and -3
Step-by-step explanation:
Descarte's rule of signs tells you the lack of sign changes among the coefficients means there are <em>no positive real roots</em>. That eliminates all answer choices except the first one.
__
If you want to go to the trouble, you can factor the equation:
y = (x +3)(x +5)
These factors are zero when x = -5 and x = -3.
Answer:
true that is the formula for a function
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Here's what I get.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Representation of data
I used Excel to create a scatterplot of the data, draw the line of best fit, and print the regression equation.
2. Line of best fit
(a) Variables
I chose arm span as the dependent variable (y-axis) and height as the independent variable (x-axis).
It seems to me that arm span depends on your height rather than the other way around.
(b) Regression equation
The calculation is easy but tedious, so I asked Excel to do it.
For the equation y = ax + b, the formulas are
This gave the regression equation:
y = 1.0595x - 4.1524
(c) Interpretation
The line shows how arm span depends on height.
The slope of the line says that arm span increases about 6 % faster than height.
The y-intercept is -4. If your height is zero, your arm length is -4 in (both are impossible).
(d) Residuals
The residuals appear to be evenly distributed above and below the predicted values.
A graph of all the residuals confirms this observation.
The equation usually predicts arm span to within 4 in.
(e) Predictions
(i) Height of person with 66 in arm span
(ii) Arm span of 74 in tall person