No because of the history between the two
<span>Because we, as a society learn from our mistakes, and while you do not know now, you may play an important role in government or leadership where the lessons learned about that period may help to avoid the mistakes of the past. Remember, those who do not learn from their mistakes are doomed to repeat them. </span>
Answer: Hoover offered nothing, unlike Roosevelt, on the economic crisis.
Explanation:
- Hoover and Roosevelt were presidents during the most significant economic crisis in American history. First, Hoover was elected president, facing eight of the most substantial financial problems in US history eight months after his inauguration. Hoover was struggling to cope with the economic woes that the crisis had brought with him. He has steadfastly refused to reach out to the Federal Reserve to help the troubled economy. His efforts to solve the problem of the economic crisis have proved unsuccessful. Thus, he intended to reduce corporate taxes to stimulate the economy and free it from government influence, which caused even more damage. Eventually, hundreds of thousands of people were impoverished and impoverished in the streets.
- Roosevelt, on the other hand, has come up with more concrete solutions to cope with the economic crisis. The New Deal Economic Reform Package has provided some - such solutions - to the troubled economy. The package thus implied an impetus for public works that entailed work on the state's infrastructure. With that, he employed tens of thousands of Americans. He ordered Congress to set up a commission to oversee the banking sector and, as part of the same reform, provide savings to Americans who feared they would be left out in the event of a bank collapse. The Indian Reorganization Act stopped the sale of Native American land and returned the Indians to their property.
It would be commutative property because no matter how you put the situation the answer will not be different/ and or wont change
