<span>He experienced an Appropriate death. This term is used to define whether a person at the time of death showed dignity in the context of their personality and their relationships with other people, or if the social situation around their death was appropriate from the personal perspective of the deceased. <span>Also in this definition can be included the style and quality of life of the person who died.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
A. approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial
Explanation:
Solomon Asch's conducted an experiment to determine how social pressure from a majoritywould affect a person to conform. In psychology, conformity is the likelihood of a person to follow the behavior of the social group an individual belongs to. In each experiment, a naive student was placed in a room with several other confederates who agreed in advance what their responses would be when presented with the line task without the real participant knowing. After line task was presented, the confederates began answering the questions correctly. However eventually began providing incorrect answers based on how they had been instructed by the experimenters. They were 18 trials and the confederates provided 12 wrong answers. The purpose of this experiment was to see if the participant would conform to that of the others in the group.
The result at the end of the experiment showed that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
Answer:
South 70 miles
Explanation: Literally just 7 times 10
