The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is: <u>historical context.</u>
<h3>
What is historical context?</h3>
Historical context can be defined as the circumstance or event that led an author to write a story.
Historical context is important as it help to reveal important details a reader may have missed out when reading an author text.
Therefore the method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is: historical context.
Learn more about Historical context here:brainly.com/question/17237466
#SPJ1
Montesquieu called the idea of dividing government power into three branches the "separation of powers." He thought it most important to create separate branches of government with equal but different powers.
HE believed it would keep the government controlled and limited .
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers were separate and kept each other in check to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting these powers, as in the monarchy of Louis XIV, would lead to despotism.
1685 I think, I'm not sure but I'll go with this answer