Specific Goals are goals that are specific, and example would be “I want to go to the beach and meditiate” so you would make it specific by saying in detail how you would get there like “sub” goals. Realistic Goals is when you have a goal that can be achieved. I’m not sure what a planning goal is.
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
When saying data we can be referring to both private information of the owner of the Smartphone as well as information of the organization since the user uses the phone to connect to services provided by it, which refers to the name of BYOD. The “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD) phenomenon is based on the modality in which members of an organization are authorized to use their own personal mobile devices (smartphones, tablets, notebooks, etc.) in the activities of the organization where they work connected to the organizational network. The use of their devices to perform their work tasks in the organization causes what was a personal device to become part of the organizational network, with the problems that this could lead to.
Answer:
The maximum investment is $6,360.111
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The placement of a new surface would reduce the annual maintenance cost to $500 per year for the first 3 years and to $1000 per year for the next 7 years. After 10 years the annual maintenance would again be $2500.
We need to find the net present value. The maximum initial investment will be the amount that makes the NPV cero.
NPV=∑[Cf/(1+i)^n]
Cf= cash flow
<u>For example:</u>
Year 1= 500/1.05= 476.19
Year 3= 500/1.05^3= 431.92
Year 5= 1,000/1.05^5= 783.53
NPV= 6,360.111
The maximum investment is $6,360.111
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
