1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ch4aika [34]
3 years ago
14

List the three components of traditional cell theory.

Biology
2 answers:
Bogdan [553]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Cells are the basic unit of structure and function for all living things.

All organisms are made of cells.

All cells come from preexisting cells.

Explanation:

took on edge and this was in the drop box in the correct answers.

mark brainliest please!

jok3333 [9.3K]3 years ago
3 0
Cell Theory #1: Cells are the basic structure and function of a living thing.
Cell Theory #2: All organisms (living things) are made out of cells.
Cell Theory #3: Only existing cells can make new cells.
You might be interested in
What activation energy was used to start the chemical reaction in the burning marshmallow?
Sonja [21]

Answer:

This question is incomplete

Explanation:

This question is incomplete. However, let's understand some terms

Activation energy is the minimum amount of energy required for a reaction to proceed. Under normal condition, when the activation energy is high, it takes longer for the reaction to proceed than when it is low.

The burning of marshmallow is an exothermic reaction as it involves the transfer of heat energy into the environment.

7 0
3 years ago
Que características poseen los babuinos que no poseen los Lemures
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Opposing thumbs, expressive faces, complex social systems: it's hard to miss the similarities between apes and humans. Now a new study with a troop of zoo baboons and lots of peanuts shows that a less obvious trait -- the ability to understand numbers -- also is shared by humans and their primate cousins.

"The human capacity for complex symbolic math is clearly unique to our species," says co-author Jessica Cantlon, assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester. "But where did this numeric prowess come from? In this study we've shown that non-human primates also possess basic quantitative abilities. In fact, non-human primates can be as accurate at discriminating between different quantities as a human child."

"This tells us that non-human primates have in common with humans a fundamental ability to make approximate quantity judgments," says Cantlon. "Humans build on this talent by learning number words and developing a linguistic system of numbers, but in the absence of language and counting, complex math abilities do still exist."

Cantlon, her research assistant Allison Barnard, postdoctoral fellow Kelly Hughes, and other colleagues at the University of Rochester and the Seneca Park Zoo in Rochester, N.Y., reported their findings online May 2 in the open-access journal Frontiers in Comparative Psychology. The study tracked eight olive baboons, ages 4 to 14, in 54 separate trials of guess-which-cup-has-the-most-treats. Researchers placed one to eight peanuts into each of two cups, varying the numbers in each container. The baboons received all the peanuts in the cup they chose, whether it was the cup with the most goodies or not. The baboons guessed the larger quantity roughly 75 percent of the time on easy pairs when the relative difference between the quantities was large, for example two versus seven. But when the ratios were more difficult to discriminate, say six versus seven, their accuracy fell to 55 percent.

That pattern, argue the authors, helps to resolve a standing question about how animals understand quantity. Scientists have speculated that animals may use two different systems for evaluating numbers: one based on keeping track of discrete objects -- a skill known to be limited to about three items at a time -- and a second approach based on comparing the approximate differences between counts.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Mendel accounted for the observation that traits that had disappeared in the f1 generation reappeared in the f2 generation by pr
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

Option C,  traits can be dominant or recessive, and the recessive traits were obscured by the dominant ones in the F1.

Explanation:

Complete question-

Mendel accounted for the observation that traits which had disappeared in the F1 generation reappeared in the F2 generation by proposing that

Select one:

a. new mutations were frequently generated in the F2 progeny, "reinventing" traits that had been lost in the F1.

b. the mechanism controlling the appearance of traits was different between the F1 and the F2 plants.

c. traits can be dominant or recessive, and the recessive traits were obscured by the dominant ones in the F1.

d. the traits were lost in the F1 due to dominance of the parental traits.

e. members of the F1 generation had only one allele for each trait, but members of the F2 had two alleles for each trait.

Solution -

In the Mendel’s experiment, some traits which were absent in the F1 generation appeared in the second generation cross. By this he concluded, that the traits exressed in the F1 generation were dominant and hence they capped the expression of traits associated witl recessive allele. He classified the traits in F2 generation as recessive, because these traits can occur only when they are in pair i.e they form individuals with homozygous recessive genotype.  

For instance – If “R” is allele for dominant red color trait and “r” is the allele for recessive white color trait, then the cross between true breeding red flowers and white flowers will produce following offspring  

RR * rr

Rr, Rr, Rr, Rr

Thus, in F1 generation all the offspring are heterozygous red

F2 generation-  

Rr * Rr

RR, Rr, Rr, rr

The recessive trait of white colored flower reappears in second generation.

Hence, option C is correct

8 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between molecules and ions and atom?​
ahrayia [7]
This might help here you go

8 0
2 years ago
Prairie dogs are a species whose very presence contributes to the existence of the ecosystem in which it lives. Prairie dogs con
Andrew [12]

Answer:

Explanation:

Key stone species

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Before testing the pea plants, Mendel formed a five-part hypothesis. What did Mendel include in his hypothesis? Check all that a
    15·2 answers
  • When comparing genomes from different species, scientists are often interested in the genome density, or the number of genes per
    11·2 answers
  • What happens to glucose inside a cell during cellular respiration
    7·1 answer
  • What stage comes after glycolysis?
    9·2 answers
  • Organisms classified as fungi have unique characteristics. which of the following characteristics is found only in organisms cla
    9·1 answer
  • When analyzing a text for the SOAPS element of "occasion", which two aspects should be considered?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following processes requires a proton gradient across a membrane?
    6·1 answer
  • A eukaryotic mutation upstream of a particular gene has been identified that changes the sequence of the TATA box to GATA. How w
    12·1 answer
  • Please faster i need the answer now
    10·1 answer
  • When growing cultures, the agar is ________ to separate pathogenic colonies of organisms from colonies of normal flora.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!