Answer: Scaffolding
Explanation:Scaffolding refers to the fact that parents can provide a structure that can assist children as they develop new skilss. The idea of this concept is that a framework or structure can help children learn new skills effectively especially those skills that are seems to be beyond those that they already have which may be difficult to crack when they don't alone. This means a parent plays a role in the development of their children which can even help them with social interaction. For example a parent can model out a problem that can arise during a play and resolve it along with the child to equip the child with proper skills to solve future conflicts.
Answer:
<u>1) Why did the critics assign this derogatory term to Henri and his followers?</u>
Because the Ashcan School was creating an art form that portraits the day by day life of ordinary and humble people, and the detractors didn't believe that this was important. The term 'Ashcan' was often used, before the formation of this art movement, to describe art forms that were not understood or accepted by the audience. An ordinary art form.
<u>2) How was realism of this twentieth-century group different from realistic representation of the nineteenth-century?</u>
Because the members of the Ashcan School were focusing to portrait the urban life, while the 19th century realism wanted to do the opposite, choosing to paint the natural elements.
<u>3) Select a work of art by one of the followers of the Ashcan School and one of the nineteenth-century realistic paintings to illustrate your discussion.</u>
For this question, I think that the paintings you need to choose to ilustrate must contrast the ideas of these groups (Ashcan School and the traditional realism). Then, I believe that 'Hester Street' executed in 1905 by George Luks is a good choice, because it's portraits excacly what the Ashcan School wanted to do with art. On the other hand, 'The Cotton Pickers' (1876) or 'Long Branch, New Jersey' (1869), both executed by Winslow Homer, are a good counter argument.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Civil War was a war between states. It lasted four years (1861-1865). The Civil War was fought in Southern Pennsylvania, but most of it took place in Virginia and Tennessee. Of course the Civil War wasn't easy. Soldiers had to deal with bad weather, hunger, and let's not forget to mention that a lot of them died in this war. One of the main reasons the Civil War happened was the issue with slavery. The Southern states wanted to get rid of any laws that would ruin the South being able to keep slaves and take them where ever they wanted. South wanted to take slavery over to the Western territories, but North wanted to stay free of slaves and continue on with white labor. So when Abraham Lincoln was elected without not one single vote from the Southern electoral vote, this made them feel left out of the political system, which turned into the Civil War. Though many people lost their lives, the United States ended up beating the Confederate States. Which led to the freedom of millions of enslaved Americans. During the Civil War women had a huge role on and off the battlefield. Women helped the soldiers, they provided medical care and some women even were brave enough to work as spies, and even bigger surprise some women were even soldiers helping fight in the Civil War. The Civil War was a BIG thing to happen in today's history, knowing that so many people put their lives on the line to make sure that all people were free and treated the same. It makes you wonder, what if these brave men AND women never stepped up and decided it was time for a change? What would life be like today?
Explanation:
OMG Writing this was actually kinda fun, I am glad I could help!
Answer:
Split-half Method.
Explanation:
Split half test is the method to assess the reliability of internal consistency.
Split-Half method is a reliability test in which to gain insight about a single knowledge, the test is divided into two parts. Then two groups of students or people are required to participate in the test at the same time. The scores of both the groups are assessed. A test that have high correlation suggests the reliability and will reveal how well or poorly the students will perform in the test.
<u>In the given case, Chan has divided the test questions into five questions each for two groups, to check the reliability of instrument. The results of both the test are assessed with the hope that they have similar results. This is the method of testing reliability with the split-half method</u>.
So, the correct answer is split-half method.
Men whose faces are wide and short are more likely to be prejudiced than those whose faces are narrower and taller according to people's assumptions.
Being prejudiced against those who were not born in the United States is an example of the same. Even if those who hold this bias don't know all foreigners personally, they disapprove of them because they are foreigners.
According to Maiolo, prejudice also inhibits a person from having the opportunity to understand a community from that culture's point of view. According to him, it can split up a group and encourage harassment, abuse, and violence. According to Mulvey, this mindset can affect possibilities for employment, health, safety, and other institutional factors.
The Latin word praejudicium, which means "judgement in advance," is related to prejudice in both form and meaning. A racial prejudice is an unfavorable viewpoint toward a group of individuals based solely on their race and not on personal knowledge or experience.
Learn more about prejudice here
brainly.com/question/22665804
#SPJ4
