All categories

3 years ago

Someone help me with this please

Business

2 answers:

ladessa [460]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C none of the above

[Sorry if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure it's that one]

Explanation:

The answer should be genotype=the Gene's of an organism

myrzilka [38]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

A. hom0zygous dominant

Explanation:

A capital letter is a dominant gene and two dominant genes would be hom0zygous

You might be interested in

Bond j has a coupon rate of 5 percent and bond k has a coupon rate of 11 percent. both bonds have 13 years to maturity, make sem

aleksley [76]

To find the change in the price of the bonds, first need to find the price of individual Bond.

Bond Price is directly related to the change in the YTM of the bond. If the YTM rises by 2%, the price of the bond will fall.

Bond J :

(WHEN YTM IS 8%)

Coupon Rate: 5%

Coupon Amount (PMT): $1,000 * 5% = $50/2 = $25 (Semi annual coupon amounts)

Number of years (NPER) = 13*2 = 26

YTM (rate) = 8%/2 = 4%

Face Value: $1000

Price (PV0) : ?

To find the price of the bond, can either use excel or with formula.

When input the below formula in excel,

PV =pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)

P0 =pv(4%,26,-25,-1000)

When input the formula in excel, we get PV as $760.26

(WHEN YTM RISES BY 2%, NEW YTM IS 10%)

Coupon Amount (PMT): $25 (Semi annual coupon amounts)

Number of years (NPER) = 26

YTM (rate) = 10%/2 = 5%

Face Value: $1000

Price (PV1) : ?

To find the price of the bond, can either use excel or with formula.

When input the below formula in excel,

PV =pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)

P1 =pv(5%,26,-25,-1000)

When input the formula in excel, we get PV as $640.62

CHANGE IN THE BOND PRICE OF BOND J DUE TO THE CHANGE IN THE YTM

%change = (P1 – P0)/P0

%change = ($640.62 - $760.26)/$760.26

%change = -18.68%

Therefore, with the increase in 2% YTM of BOND J, the price falls by 18.68%

Bond K :

(WHEN YTM IS 8%)

Coupon Rate: 11%

Coupon Amount (PMT): $1,000 * 11% = $110/2 = $55 (Semi annual coupon amounts)

Number of years (NPER) = 13*2 = 26

YTM (rate) = 8%/2 = 4%

Face Value: $1000

Price (PV0) : ?

To find the price of the bond, can either use excel or with formula.

When input the below formula in excel,

PV =pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)

P0 =pv(4%,26,-55,-1000)

When input the formula in excel, we get PV as $1,239.74

(WHEN YTM RISES BY 2%, NEW YTM IS 10%)

Coupon Amount (PMT): $55 (Semi annual coupon amounts)

Number of years (NPER) = 26

YTM (rate) = 10%/2 = 5%

Face Value: $1000

Price (PV1) : ?

To find the price of the bond, can either use excel or with formula.

When input the below formula in excel,

PV =pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)

P1 =pv(5%,26,-55,-1000)

When input the formula in excel, we get PV as $1,071.88

CHANGE IN THE BOND PRICE OF BOND K DUE TO THE CHANGE IN THE YTM

%change = (P1 – P0)/P0

%change = ($1071.88 - $1239.74)/$1239.74

%change = -13.54%

Therefore, with the increase in 2% YTM of BOND k, the price falls by 13.54%

SIMILALRY IF THE BOND PRICES FALLS BY 2%, the YTM WILL BE 6%/2 = 3% **(REFER THE IMAGE ATTACHED)

5 0

3 years ago

Compared to a monopoly that does not priceâ€‹ discriminate, a monopolist who engages in perfect price discrimination will produc

pantera1 [17]

Answer:

An output that maximizes revenue and profits. If a firm can price discriminate, it will sell its product or service at a different price to every single consumer. Perfect price discrimination refers to pricing your product at exactly the highest amount that each individual consumer is willing to pay, i.e. consumer surplus disappears.

7 0

3 years ago

Senator Brown wants to increase taxes on people with high incomes and use the money to help the poor. Senator Johnson argues tha

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints

Explanation:

Based on this information it can be said that an economist would most likely state that a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints. That is because every decision will affect everyone, but some individuals will be affected positively while others will be affected negatively. Therefore trying to recognize the viewpoint of both sides will allow for decisions that are as fair as possible to both sides.

6 0

3 years ago

If real GDP is $200 billion, full employment GDP is $500 billion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, then Congress

Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

The answer is: decrease taxes by $100 billion.

Explanation:

If the real GD is $200 billion, which represents only 40% of full employment GDP, then the government should try to increase consumer spending either by decreasing taxes or increasing government spending, or a combination of both.

In this case, I chose the tax decrease since government have budget limitations and they can only decrease taxes by so much before hitting a deficit. Additionally, when you have a large tax reduction, usually government spending either stays the same or decreases.

If the government decreases taxes by $100 billion, the marginal propensity to consume shall result in a $75 billion increase in consumption. According to the Keynesian Multiplier theory, that $75 billion should generate additional production, creating a virtuous cycle that should increase the real GDP in a larger proportion.

3 0

3 years ago

The methods allowed by the IFRS for valuing property, plant, and equipment are:______.

pogonyaev

Answer:

The methods allowed by the IFRS for valuing property, plant, and equipment are: b. historic cost and fair value.

Explanation:

IAS 16 in IFRS deals with Valuation of Property, Plant, and Equipment.

The method of subsequent measurement of Property, Plant, and Equipment allowed by the standars are Historic Cost and Fair Value (Revaluation)

3 0

3 years ago