All categories

3 years ago

I didn't mean to press that answer but please help.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Alika [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are FOUR equal sides so we eliminate some of the shapes that dont have equal sides.

We need a FOUR sided shape so we eliminate all the shapes that DONT have 4 sides.

We are now left with:

Square and rhombus.

You might be interested in

This question has two parts.

Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why does paramcium never die

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

the paracium never dies because it keeps on reproducing

Step-by-step explanation:

the paracium lets say it starts as 1

and then taht 1 divides inti

1/2 and 1/2 and that 1/2 turns into 1

and it keeps on dividing and multiplying

7 0

4 years ago

Megan measures the height and arm spans of the girls on her basketball team. She plots the data and makes a scatterplot comparin

jeka57 [31]

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:AP3X

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a > b > c > d, then which is larger, a+c or b+d ? Can we tell from a > b > c > d which of a+d and b+c is la

victus00 [196]

Answer:

1. a+c is larger than b+d

2. No way to tell whether a+d or b+c is larger.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Which is larger, a+c or b+d?

Let a, b, c, and d be any numbers such that $a > b > c > d$ .

Specifically, note that $a > b$ , and subtracting b from both sides of the inequality, observe that $a-b > 0$ .

Similarly, $c > d$ , and subtracting d from both sides of the inequality, observe that $c-d > 0$ .

From this, add "a-b" (a positive number, as proven above) to both sides of the inequality.

$(a-b)+(c-d) > (a-b)+0$

Addition by zero (the additive identity) doesn't change anything, so the right side remains "a-b"...

$(a-b)+(c-d) > a-b$

... and "a-b" is positive...

$(a-b)+(c-d) > a-b > 0$

... so, by the transitive property of inequality...

$(a-b)+(c-d) > 0$

Recall that subtraction is addition by a negative number...
$a+(-b)+c+(-d) > 0$

...and that addition is associative and commutative, so things can be added in any order, so the middle two terms on the left side can be rearranged...

$a+c+(-b)+(-d) > 0$

Adding b + d to both sides of the inequality

$(a+c+(-b)+(-d))+(b+d) > 0+(b+d)$

... and simplifying

$a+c > b+d$

So, a+c is larger than b+d.

2. Which is larger, a+d or b+c?

Consider the following two examples:

Example 1

Suppose a=10; b=3; c=2; d=1.

Note that $a > b > c > d$ ( $10 > 3 > 2 > 1$ ) and, also observe that $a+d=(10)+(1)=11$ , and $b+c=(3)+(2)=5$ , so a+d is larger than b+c.

Example 2

However, suppose a=10; b=9; c=8; d=1.

Note that $a > b > c > d$ ( $10 > 9 > 8 > 1$ ) but that $a+d=(10)+(1)=11$ , and $b+c=(9)+(8)=17$ , so a+d is smaller than b+c.

So, in one example, a+d is bigger, and in the other, a+d is smaller. Therefore, there is no way to tell which of a+d or b+c is larger from only the given information.

5 0

2 years ago

Tamar surveyed six friends, asking each how many times he or she had ridden in a helicopter. The numbers of times she recorded w

kipiarov [429]

well, to do this we first need to find the mean of all values.

we need to find the distance of each value from that mean (subtract the mean from each value, ignore minus signs)

Then find the mean of those distances.

so, after we do all of that with the given numbers, our final result would be 2.333333333..... (It goes on) we round it up to 2.3, and viola! the answer is C.

6 0

3 years ago