there are different meanings of soil. here are a few with some examples :
-"She soiled herself because her parents wouldn't take her to the bathroom." You can first assume it has to do with the bathroom because it says so in the text, now another definition of soil is dirt, or the top layer of the earth. using this definition you can assume it is dirty. Then another clue would be that SHE soiled HERSELF. Using these clues you can assume it means that she had to use the BATHROOM and because her parents wouldn't let her she went to the bathroom on herself.
-"The Gardner put some new soil down to help cover the gopher holes." You can now assume that soil has to do with gardening because it says so in the text. You can also infer that they used it to cover gopher holes. You can now get a better understanding because gophers like to dig holes in dirt. Using these clues you can predict soil is dirt.
Answer: paradox
Expiation: It is clearly sand so it is obviously found to be true, which is what makes it a paradox
The noun clause in the given sentence is an indirect object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun and can fulfill the function of a subject, direct and indirect object, object of a preposition, or predicate nominative. Noun clauses begin with words such as <em>how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, </em>and <em>why. </em>In the given sentence, a noun clause is <em>whomever wins the Spirit Award.</em>
An indirect object usually refers to someone or something that is affected by the action of a transitive verb, most commonly as a recipient. <em>Whomever wins the Spirit Award </em>is an indirect object of the sentence and represents the recipient (someone who will receive a scholarship).
The subject of the sentence is <em>the league. </em>As there is no preposition in the sentence, the given noun phrase can't be an object of a preposition. The predicate nominative is a noun that follows a linking verb and renames or describes the subject. Nothing like that is encountered in the sentence either. So, the correct option is<em> indirect object.</em>
Learn more about noun clauses here: brainly.com/question/2416201
#LearnWithBrainly
Well, there could be many reasons. First off, there are many different historical and cultural differences between Shakespeare's time and modern times that a modern student doesn't pick up on, doesn't understand.
Second, you simply have to take into account the fact that, with modern technology, students' attention spans have gotten so bad that simply reading Shakespeare plays is "too boring" for them.
Modern students want quick answers, a bubble they can circle on a multiple choice test type of answer. Interpreting Shakespearean plays requires thought and critical thinking, things that, I'm sorry, but no students seem to use nowadays.
Also, there is the small fact that, especially amongst teenage males, things like plays and reading Shakespeare are labeled as feminine or "gay".
I would say I will definitely check reliability and safety.
