The Indian removal act authorized the president (Andrew Jackson at the time) not to sell the land to the natives, did not forcibly remove them or buy the land from them. We exchanged land with NA, making them move farther west while we took the middle eastern states.
So that being said your answer is B
To complete question, the passage your question is referring to from Jacob Riis's “how the Other Half Lives” is written below
"With no steady hand to guide him, the boy takes naturally to idle ways. Caught in the street by the truant officer, or by the agents of the Children’s Societies, peddling, perhaps, or begging, to help out the family resources, he runs the risk of being sent to a reformatory, where contact with vicious boys older than himself soon develop the latent possibilities for evil that lie hidden in him. The city has no Truant Home in which to keep him, and all efforts of the children’s friends to enforce school attendance are paralyzed by this want. The risk of the reformatory is too great." – Jacob Riis”
<h2>Further Explanation</h2>
I will select three sentences and argue from the point of view presented by Jacob Riis from the passage
- The first sentence from the passage means that a child is performing an action without his parent guidance. It also means there was no one to put him on the right track
- The second sentence means that the child was arrested because of his actions, which also implies that he faced the consequences of his actions.
- The third sentence means that there is a house in a city that has no guard and that all the children in the city appeared to be forced to get a quality education.
Learn more about Jacob Riis’s how the other half lives at:
brainly.com/question/10582888
#learnwithbrainly
Answer:
For William to deal with a rebellion well, it was essential that he responded quickly to prevent the rebellion from spreading, was able to apprehend the leaders to prevent any further disturbances, and take measures to ensure that such a rebellion could not happen again.
William defeated the rebellion but he still didn't trust the English people. In the north-east of England, from 1069 to 1070, he ordered villages to be destroyed and people to be killed. Herds of animals and crops were burnt.
Answer:
During the 1700s, people in different colonies produced different kinds of things to sell. For example, people in the southern colonies produced cotton and tobacco while people in the New England colonies produced ships and whale oil. People in the different colonies then sold the things they made to the people in the other colonies
How did this voluntary trade benefit people in both regions?
A. It made it possible for them to have things that they could not produce themselves.
B. It meant that they did not have to buy anything from England.
C. It meant that they did not have to sell anything to England
D. It made it possible for them to have things that they could not afford to pay for.
Explanation:
The answer is A because B said that they did not have to buy anything from England but england is the place that is producing and selling products and C is wrong because yes England my produce multiple products but England still needs resources and D is also wrong because they said they sold all the items and not that they were free