Answer:
x= 16 and y = 9
Step-by-step explanation:
1 st equation ; x+y = 25
2 nd equation ; x- y = 7
from 1 st equation
x = 25 - y
now putting value of x in 2 nd equation
x- y = 7
25 - y-y = 7
25 -2y =7
25-7 = 2y
18 = 2y
18/2 = y
y = 9
again
putting value of y in 1 st equation
x = 25-y
x = 25-9
x= 16
5/6:x/5844
Cross multiply to get
29220=6x
x=4870
4870+5844=
10714 votes
Hope this helped :)
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
The same as last time
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of the shaded region=area of the greater rectangle- area of the inner rectangle.
Area of a rectangle=length x width.
Area of the greater rectangle=(8x-1)(6x)
area of the inner rectangle=(5x+3)(2x)
Area of the shaded region=(8x-1)(6x)-(5x+3)(2x)
=48x²-6x-(10x²+6x)
=48x²-6x-10x²-6x
=38x²-12x
Answer: the area of the shaded region would be: 38x²-12x
