The best cooling methods include all the following except

Sabrina Duncan had gross earnings for the pay period ending 10/15/16 of $5,835. Her total gross earnings as of 9/30/16 were $104

ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

option (A) $212.97

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Gross earnings for the pay period ending 10/15/16 = $5,835

Total gross earnings as of 9/30/16 = $104,400

Social Security tax rate = 6.2%

Now,

Total earnings

= Gross earnings for the pay period ending 10/15/16 + Total gross earnings as of 9/30/16

= $5,835 + $104,400

= $110,235

since,The Social Security taxes are on a maximum earnings of $106,800 per year

therefore,

Sabrina's Social Security withheld from her 10/15/16 paycheck will be

= ( Total earnings - $106,800 ) × Social Security tax rate

= ( $110,235 - $106,800 ) × 0.062

= $3,435 × 0.062

= $212.97

Hence,

The answer is option (A) $212.97

7 0

3 years ago

On December 31, 2018, Gardner Company holds debt securities classified as HTM with a face amount of $100,000 and a carrying valu

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

$2,850

Explanation:

Given the following :

Face value of security = $100,000

Carrying value = $95,000

Effective interest rate = 6%

Interest paid semianually = $2500

The effective interest revenue recognized for the six months ended December 31, 2018 is:

IF effective interest rate = 6%

Semiannual interest = 6% / 2 = 3%

Therefore effective interest revenue for six months will be the product of the carrying value and the interest rate within the six months period :

3% = 0.03

0.03 * $95,000 = $2,850

3 0

3 years ago

Brewster's is considering a project with a life of 5 years and an initial cost of $120,000. The discount rate for the project is

PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

Net present value 27.792‬

Explanation:

Sales 2.100 units x 20 net cash flow = $ 42,000 cash flow per year

Present value of the first three years:

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 42,000

time 3 years

discount rate: 0.12

$42000 \times \frac{1-(1+0.12)^{-3} }{0.12} = PV\\$

PV $100,876.9133

For year 4 and 5 we need to check for the expected cashflow

We will multiply each outcome by their probability:

1,400 units x $20 per unit x 0.5 chance = 14,000

2,500 units x $20 per unit x 0.5 chance = 25,000

expected return: 39,000

present value of these years:

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity $39,000.0000

time 4 end of year 4th

rate 0.12

$\frac{39000}{(1 + 0.12)^{4} } = PV$

PV 24,785.21

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity $39,000.0000

time 5 end of year 5th

rate 0.12

$\frac{39000}{(1 + 0.12)^{5} } = PV$

PV 22,129.65

Net present value will be the present value of the cash flow less the investment.

100,877 + 24,785 + 22,130 - 120,000 = 27.792‬

7 0

3 years ago

Business ethics concerns:

Softa [21]

Ethics refers to acceptable conduct in any setting therefore it concernscconcerns the behaviour thebehavioithbusiness

6 0

4 years ago

The reasons for using the variable-cost approach include all of the following except this approach provides the most defensible

Ber [7]

Answer:

The reasons for using the variable-cost approach include all of the following except

this approach provides the most defensible bases for justifying prices to all interested parties.

Explanation:

This is not part of the reasons for using the variable-cost approach. But options b, c, and d are certainly the reasons why the variable-cost approach is used. The variable-cost approach provides a differential analysis for decision-making. It assigns overhead costs to the period in which they are incurred, while other variable costs are assigned to the merchandise produced within that period. Thus, by excluding fixed manufacturing overhead cost, only the direct costs associated with production are used in accounting for the product's costs.

3 0

3 years ago