Answer:A. are likely to have at least one obese parent.
Explanation:
Children when they grow up mostly look up to their parents whatever habit that the parent is involved in the child is likely to think that habit is not wrong .
For example parents who buys unhealthy food or eat unhealthy are very likely to influence their children to go down the same path.
Children eat what is available at home and follow the pattern of eating that they see at home .
If they see binge eating being a norm they will also binge on food .
So it is very likely that an obese child has one parent who is also obese .
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
The mandate of heaven was used as a justification for the ruling of a family or the switch of power to a new family
Explanation:
The mandate of heaven justified that a certain person or family was in power as God desired for them to be in this position of power. However, when power switched or there was a new ruler in power it was justified through the fact that the previous family/ruler/dynasty lost the mandate of heaven, likely through some action that they did, or some even that happened during their reign, like drought
Hope that helped:)
<span>39.9526° N, 75.1652° W</span>