Consider the equation.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:
The alternate hypotesis is:
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that
The test-statistic is:
The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
false
Step-by-step explanation:
Both of the matrices are 1 x 1 ("one by one"), so they can be added to produce a 1 x 1 matrix.
To add (or subtract) two matrices, they must be the same size.
(m x n) + (m x n) = (m x n)
m x n means a matrix has m rows and n columns. Dimensions are always named in that order: rows, then columns.