Answer: -6x² + 15x + 5
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem, you only need to substitute g(x)'s equation as the value of the x in f(x), then simplify.
Step 1: f(x) = -3(2x² - 5x - 1) + 2
Step 2: Apply the distributive property
-3(2x²) + -3(-5x) + -3(-1)
-6x² + 15x + 3
Step 3: Simplify
f(x) = -6x² + 15x + 3 + 2
f(x) = -6x² + 15x + 5
Hi your answer would be 6 1/2 vials of pixie dust!
Answer:
compare the distance between the lines at one point to the distance between the lines at another point
Step-by-step explanation:
You can construct perpendiculars at different points and compare the distance between the lines at those perpendiculars. The distance between parallel lines is the same everywhere.
First you plug in for x,
2(y-3)+y=12
Then you solve for y
2y-5+y=12
-10y+y=12
-9y=12
-9y/9=12/-9
y=-1.333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
