It is based on the assumption that the <span>diplomats will obey the laws of their country of residence. They don't have to abide by laws because they have immunity that protects them from prosecution. This was introduced to make it possible for diplomats to say what they wanted against those who ruled without being prosecuted.</span>
According to me, all of his policies were not successful. They had disadvantages which changed the world
Explanation:
The correct answer among all the other choices is C. The feuds between religious and secular power over investiture. The fall of the western Roman empire contributed most directly to this circumstance. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
They argued about ratification and how many states would need to agree for the Constitution to take effect is the answer that summarizes the main argument between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the Constitutional Convention. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option.
I believe the answer is A. He developed the idea of the "invisible hand" of the free market, which continually keeps the economy on course. This can be found in his book "<span>The Wealth of Nations".
</span>
Hope this Helps! :)
