Answer:
Collectivist values are represented in the social framework of which of the following countries?
C. Brazil
Explanation:
There are different values in the social framework that different countries utilized in the development of various economic models, namely; individualistic and collectivist values. They are further explained below;
1. Collectivist value
These are values that promote group effort and work to achieve certain social and economic goals. The groups can be family groups or even work groups. A major aspect of collectivist is that they disregard personal achievement and desires. Collectivist values discourages competition and encourages empathy for other people. Collectivist value however,has it's disadvantages like; a lack of competition produces doesn't bring quality in terms of production and leadership skills. Examples of countries that have collectivist culture are; China, Korea, Japan, and Brazil. Brazil is a deeply collectivist culture since they expect loyalty between family members and groups.
2. Individualistic value
These are values that encourage personal effort, desires and achievements above group efforts. Individualistic values have the disadvantage of causing high competition that can at times lead to aggression and war, however, these value also have there advantages since most people are more independent and self-sufficient. Examples of countries that have individualistic values are; United States, Australia, and Great Britain.
Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
Answer:
B. They have a history of not making their payments on time.
Explanation:
