The deadweight loss from a tax is likely to be greater with a good that has many substitute.
<h3>What is deadweight loss?</h3>
This refers to scenario, tax imposed create loss of economic sufficiency; when the supply of goods and services aren't met.
Dead weight loss is the inefficiency that occurs when the market is not in equilibrium.
Learn more about deadweight loss here: brainly.com/question/26362939
#SPJ1
<span>Operational management manages activities that are involved in creating value by producing goods and services and distributing them to customers.
</span>Effectiveness is a term used in operational management to describe using resources to create value by providing customers with goods and services that offer a better relationship between price and perceived benefits.
Answer:
e, e ,i, i, i, e is the order from top to bottom
Answer:supplier partnerships
Explanation:supplier partnership is a commitment over an extended time to work together to the mutual benefit of both parties, sharing relevant information and the risks and rewards of the relationship.
In quality control, extended relationship between buyers and sellers based on confidence, credibility, and mutual benefit. The buyer, on its part, provides long-term contracts and assurance of only a small number of competing suppliers. In reciprocation, the seller implements customer's suggestions and commits to continuous improvement in quality of product and delivery.
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed