Answer:
(D) I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets look at our answer choices; A.
The intervals are not comparable. The shorter bar spans more than 10 years. When it comes to a horizontal axis it doesn't matter how far it expands,just if it's expanded correctly.
B.The intervals are appropriately labeled. There not it goes from 25 to 50 in just in instant few climbs up.
C.The intervals are not comparable, but the data on the graph is not misleading. It is misleading the graphs are incorrectly labeled.
Which brings us to our answer D.The vertical axis does not have an appropriate scale. it goes from 0-25 25-50 and 50-75 then 75-100. that's a short distance for such numbers that are pretty far apart.
I hope I'm right and I hope this helps:)!
0<4x + 8<12 BADDA-BING-BADDA-BOOM!!! :-)
x is the number of adults and y is the number of children.
x + y = 12
<span>14x + 10y = 140
lets multiply the first equation by -10 and then add it to the second equation:
-10x - 10y = -120
</span>14x + 10y = <span>140
</span>-----------------------
4x + 0 = 20
x = 20/4
x = 5
then substitute in the original equation:
x + y = <span>12
</span>5 + y = <span>12
</span>y = 12 - 5
y = 7
therefore there were 5 adults and 7 children
Let the width of the frame = x
Let the cost of a linear foot of the frame = y
Let the inside dimension of the length of the frame = a
Let the inside dimension of the width of the frame = b.
The total length of the frame = 2*a + 4x
The total width of the frame = 2b
The total amount of the frame in feet is (2a + 4x + 2b)*y = Cost
If this is incorrect please leave a message on my home page.
Answer:
3/6
Step-by-step explanation:
Well 3 is half of 6 and if you were to turn that into a fraction it would either be 3/6 or 1/2.
