Can someone help meee
1 answer:
You might be interested in
For the first part:
Every shirt she grabs, will cost her dollars, so if she grabs 3 shirts, then the cost of the shirts is:
With the same rationale, if she grabs 2 pairs of jeans, the cost of the jeans is:
So, her total is:
If you subtract 3 from the total, then the expression is:
For the second part:
If she's paying 3 less for each shirt, then the cost of 3 shirts will become:
In the same fashion, for the two jeans:
So the expression for the total cost is:
For number three:
The amounts are different because the cost of the total purchase is different than the cost of each element that makes up the total purchase.
For number four:
If you're the owner, you want to give the smallest amount of discount (the one in part 1/a).
So you could clarify by saying there's 3 dollars of the TOTAL purchase's cost.
Every shirt she grabs, will cost her dollars, so if she grabs 3 shirts, then the cost of the shirts is:
With the same rationale, if she grabs 2 pairs of jeans, the cost of the jeans is:
So, her total is:
If you subtract 3 from the total, then the expression is:
For the second part:
If she's paying 3 less for each shirt, then the cost of 3 shirts will become:
In the same fashion, for the two jeans:
So the expression for the total cost is:
For number three:
The amounts are different because the cost of the total purchase is different than the cost of each element that makes up the total purchase.
For number four:
If you're the owner, you want to give the smallest amount of discount (the one in part 1/a).
So you could clarify by saying there's 3 dollars of the TOTAL purchase's cost.
Answer:
Correct choice is B
Step-by-step explanation:
In step 4 were proved that
By definition, similar triangles have proportional lengths of corresponding sides. To the side AB corresponds side ED, to the side AC corresponds side DC and to the side BC corresponds side EC. Thus,