Losing face is a primary danger in a "collectivist" culture
.
A collectivist culture is one that depends on esteeming the requirements of a gathering or a network over the person. Connection, family, and network are critical. Individuals tend to cooperate to make amicability and gathering attachment is to a great degree esteemed. People in a collectivist culture are probably going to esteem what is useful for the entire over what is beneficial for one individual.
Collectivistic cultures accentuate the necessities and objectives of the gathering all in all finished the requirements and wants of every person. In such societies, associations with different individuals from the gathering and the interconnectedness between individuals assume a focal part in every individual's personality. Societies in Asia, Central America, South America, and Africa have a tendency to be more collectivistic.
There were 3 main colonies that were established for the sole purpose of religious freedom.
One was in Maryland, established by George Calvert. Meant for Puritans, it was establish due to their dislike of Roman Catholics.
In Pennsylvania, another one was established by William Penn for Quakers.
Finally, Rodger Williams in settled in RI after leaving Salem, MA. This became a religious sanctuary for all religions.
This is assuming the questions context; but I hope this was able to answer your question, or minimally help you out!
Answer:
Many decisions are taken at the margin
Explanation:
Many decision are taken at the margin.
He makes small changes at the margin in the number of hours spent training on each activity.
Paola and his wife both realise that increasing time spend in the pool will decrease his total triathlon time.
His time is fixed (20hrs) and anytime he wants to spend extra on one activity, i means that he cannot spend time on another (this is known as opportunity cost).
They are both on the same page in terms of trying to improve Paolo's total time (exploiting opportunities to makes themselves better off).
1hour switch in Paolo's point of view isa major change, whereas his wife recommends a wholesale change.
Paolo realises that as he spends more time in the pool improving his swim time, his run and cycle times will take a hit. As he swims more, his improvement is likely to slow down, while spending less time on cycling and running will cost him more in terms of time.
Hence Paolo is looking at the margins.
His wife on the other hand, is not, she is ignoring the interaction, may be forgetting the ncreasing deterioration in terms of time of the other 2 legs
C. is your answer, they didn’t call them “mailmen” they were called runners because it was easier I guess =/
Hope this helps you ♥︎
