Answer:
- Dr Bad Debt expense 6,000
- Cr Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account 6,000
Explanation:
The total estimated bad debts are $4,800 (= $80,000 x 6%). So the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account ending balance should be $4,800. Since this account is a contra asset account, the ending balance should be $4,800 credited.
But currently the account has a $1,200 debit balance (it's like -$1,200), so the adjustment record must be = $4,800 + $1,200 = $6,000
That way the ending balance = $6,000 - $1,200 = $4,800
The journal entries should be:
- Dr Bad Debt expense 6,000
- Cr Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account 6,000
Answer:
Following are the answer to this question:
Explanation:
It is a great approach since it encourages and guarantees enhanced investment in infrastructure. Even so, a reduction in the possible future investment funds caused by government confidence will also result in business mistakes or failures throughout the investment process, and that's why the officials of the White House frequently exude a greater level of pride in prospects for the economic system than they feel.
Answer:
C. The sale of equipment.
Explanation:
Investing activities: It records those activities that include the long-term asset buying and selling. The buying is a cash outflow while the sale is a cash inflow.
The cash outflow decreases the cash balance whereas cash inflow increases the cash balance. So the buying would be shown in a negative sign while the selling is shown in the positive sign
Hence, the correct option is C.
Answer:
2016: $300 million; 40%; $60 million
2017: $450 million; 60%; $90 million
Explanation:
Total costs:
= Costs incurred in 2016 + Costs incurred in 2017
= $240 + $360
= $600
In 2016:
Percent of total excepted costs:
= Costs incurred in 2016 ÷ Total costs
= $240 ÷ $600
= 0.4 or 40%
Revenue recognized:
= Percent of total excepted cost × Contract price
= 0.4 × $750 million
= $300 million
Income = Revenue recognized - Costs incurred in 2016
= $300 million - $240 million
= $60 million
In 2017:
Percent of total excepted costs:
= Costs incurred in 2017 ÷ Total costs
= $360 ÷ $600
= 0.6 or 60%
Revenue recognized:
= Percent of total excepted cost × Contract price
= 0.6 × $750 million
= $450 million
Income = Revenue recognized - Costs incurred in 2017
= $450 million - $360 million
= $90 million
Answer:
The refund claimed should be shown as a benefit due to loss carryback in 2018.
Explanation:
Since Tanner, Inc. incurred a financial and taxable loss for 2018. and decided to use the carryback provisions as it had been profitable up to this year, the amounts related to the carryback should be reported in the 2018 financial statements as a benefit due.
Tax loss carryback is when a corporation <u>retrospectively adjusts its tax returns for prior periods</u> if it incurs a net operating loss (NOL) in current period.
The loss carryback <u>generates a tax refund</u> for the business because it reduces previous year tax liability. After the carried back loss is applied, it will be <u>as though the business overpaid taxes the previous year; which will now be shown as a benefit in the current year</u>