<span>The decline of feudalism occurred due to a number of events which occurred during the Medieval era of the Middle Ages.</span>
Answer:
United Nation was the organization which planed to create separate Jewish and Arab States in Palestine following World War II.
Explanation: 'The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine' was a proposal by United Nation which stated two separate country for for Jewish and the Palestine. The resolution was adopted in 1947 and it was adopted as the Resolution 181(II).
The partition plan was suggested a separate country for Arabs and the Jewish and the end of the British mandate. The resolution was combined of four parts which also recommended to remove the troops peacefully.
The plan also suggested an economic union for the proposed states and a commission for the religion and the minority group.
Answer:
Lexington and Concord and British retreated, then most colonists began to cry for independence
Explanation:
This sentence is taken from the declaration of independence of the United States, this document is very important for American citizens, not only at this point but throughout history. It represents the deepest values of American society and the principles they have lived with up to now.
The organization was League of Nations
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
