Answer:
The answer is 5/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1 : Convert both fractions so they have the same denominator (bottom number in the fraction.)
1/4 = 2/8
So now were dealing with :
2/8 + 3/8 = ?
Step 2 : Add the numerators together to get the numerator for our answer.
2 + 3 = 5
When adding two fractions with the same denominator the denominator stays the same, so our answer is 5/8.
Hope this helps, please mark brainliest. :) Have a nice day.
Answer:
i hope <em>this </em><em>will</em><em> help</em><em> </em>you
The slope intercept form of a line is y = mx + b
Plug in the slope, 6, into m.
Rewrite the equation;
- y = 6x + b
- We need to find b, your y-intercept, to finish this equation.
Plug in your point coordinate, (x, y) ⇒ (-12, -14) into the equation.
Solve for b to find the y-intercept.
Your new equation (your answer) is<em> </em>y = 6x + 58.
Give me branliest then pm me k :)
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
