Answer:
The options for this question are the following:
a. Star
b. Cash Cow
c. Question Mark
d. Dog
e. None of these
The correct answer is b. Cash Cow
.
Explanation:
The cash cow is a metaphor for a cash cow that produces milk throughout its life and requires little maintenance. A cash cow is an example of a cash cow, since after the initial capital outlay has been paid, the cow continues to produce milk for many years. These cash generators can also use their money to repurchase shares in the market or pay dividends to shareholders.
A cash cow is a company or business unit in a mature, slow-growing industry. Milk cows have a large market share and require little investment. For example, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is considered a cash cow because it has established a well-defined niche in wireless gadgets. The different Apple product lines generate cash for other business lines at the beginning of their life cycle. On the contrary, a star is a company or business unit that operates in a high-growth industry. Question marks are the problematic son of the BCG shared growth matrix. They operate in high-growth markets and require capital to grow, but the probability of success is unknown. Dogs do not require much cash, but due to age, they tend to absorb large portions of capital.
Answer:
The correct option is :
This stock is overvalued; you shouldn't consider adding it to your portfolio.
Explanation:
The stocks that are in cedar valley corporation has a price that exceedes its present value from this statement the first given option doesn't justify as the stocks rates are not undervalued.
Now, in the second option its again given that the stock will be overvalued which is true but it should be added to the portfolio is not correct. so, this option is not considered.
In the third option it mentions that stock is overvalued which is the correct option and also that it shouldn't be added in portfolio.
And the last one states that its undervalued which restricts the option at this point only.
So, third option is correct.
One major difference between low-income children who participated in the high-scope preschool project and those that did not participate was that at the age of 27 years, <u>those who practiced were more likely to be married and own their house</u>.
The Perry Preschool project set up the lasting human and economic price of early life schooling and caused the establishment of the HighScope education studies foundation and one of the first early formative years applications in the u.s. intentionally designed to increase faculty fulfillment for preschool.
Outcomes of the Perry Preschool program consist of: better school fulfillment; extended excessive college graduation prices amongst women; higher employment charges; better profits; and notably decrease crime fees. There were no lasting profits on checks of intellectual performance (IQ exams).
The HighScope educational research foundation research strategies for early formative years of education are primarily based on the methods of the 1962 Perry Preschool observation. It was founded in 1970 with the aid of psychologist David Weikart.
Learn more about the Perry Preschool program here brainly.com/question/25630852
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. role relativism
Explanation:
In this relativism the moral fits to the goals of the company so its adjusted to gain the goals set inside the firm regardless personal views.
