Answer:
B. Petroleum
Explanation:
Silver is second.
Hope this helps, have a great day/night!
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:
I strongly believe I can take on the job in the police force. In the police force qualities such as leadership, bravery, confidense, and determination are needed. I have these qualities but, I lack leadership. I have a habit of doing things by myself. I would much rather complete tasks on my own rather than work with others.
Explanation:
Answer:
Interrupted time series
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, Interrupted time series analysis, sometimes known as quasi-experimental time series analysis, is an approach for the analysis of a single time series of data known or conjectured to be affected by interventions (controlled external influences).It refer to the specific point at which the intervention was implemented and allow researchers to examine the effect of an intervention where multiple observations are obtained prior to the intervention to establish a baseline.
