Answer:
The answer to the question is option <em>"A," which states that the cost of the market basket equaled $160 in 1996</em>
Explanation:
<em>Currently, the reference base for most CPI indexes is 1982- 84=100 but some indexes have other references bases. The reference base years refer to the period in which the index is set to 100.0. In addition, expenditure weights are updated every two years to keep the CPI current with changing consumer preferences.</em>
Answer:
$50,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the amount of the loss on sale of receivables that CarsRUs would recognize at the sale of its receivables
Using this formula
Loss on sale of receivables=[(Recourse Accounts receivable*Finance fee charges)+Estimated recourse liability]
Let plug in the formula
Loss on sale of receivables=(3%*$800,000)+$26,000
Loss on sale of receivables=$24,000+$26,000
Loss on sale of receivables=$50,000
Therefore the amount of the loss on sale of receivables that CarsRUs would recognize at the sale of its receivables will be $50,000
I don’t know if the numbers are supposed to be together or not but if it’s 752,863 than the expanded notation is:
700,000
+ 50,000
+ 2,000
+ 800
+ 50
+ 3
And if it is 752; 863 than the expanded notation is:
700
+ 50
+ 2
;
800
+ 60
+ 3
Answer:
The answer is (C) Jade has lost a significant chunk of its global cadre in the recent past owing to its failure to offer feasible options to address the dual-career couples dilemma.
Explanation:
This is a commonplace problem for expatriates who are married, and with both husband and wife thriving in their respective careers. If both individuals have office-based jobs that require them to be based from certain locations, an international work placement for either one would be difficult for either partner to accept if they do not wish to be away from their partners. If the company cannot come up with a good solution to this issue, they will have significant amount of talents that are not appropriately used to their extent – or worse, losing a number of them to competing firms.
<span>In a contingency table, the joint events are mutually exclusive because they consist of unique combinations of individual events that are mutually exclusive. For an individual to be described by one of the joint events, the individual must be described using each of the two attributes measured in the table. Since the possibilities for each of the two attribute are mutually exclusive, there can be only one way for an individual to be labeled with each pair of attributes. Therefore there can only be one joint event in the table that describes the individual.</span>
