Explanation:
I think the answer is c but i don't know for sure
Answer:
the others are already answered
Explanation:
For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action
Answer:
the answer is true mark brainlest
I’m pretty sure this is a capital crime, I’m not sure why it’s not an option
The Supreme Court original jurisdiction applies to cases involving disputes between states, action involving various public officials, disputes between the United States and a state.
Hope this helps :)
