1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anyanavicka [17]
2 years ago
14

PLEASE HELP ! need for todayPLEASE EXPLAIN

Law
2 answers:
WITCHER [35]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

NCVS

Explanation:

uysha [10]2 years ago
4 0
What is the net ionic for FeBr2 + 2KOH = Fe(OH)2 + 2KBr ?
You might be interested in
Transparency and accountable is one of the principle of dimocratic system why
MrRa [10]

Answer:

lol

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Officer Jax was new on the job. He saw a man dressed all in black sneak in to an apartment through the front door. Jax followed
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

The Fourth Amendment.

From the Constitution:

<em>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.</em>

<em></em>

I hope this helped!

8 0
3 years ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your i
uysha [10]

Answer: I think that the rule is very wrong and it is very foolish.

I think that if someone is breaking the law, we should be able to provide all the evidence we need to put this thief behind bars.

If nobody recorded, how else would the evidence get to the police?

If nobody recorded, the thief can say that he did not steal anything.

The Police and the Supreme Court need to have evidence that way there is no confusion and that way there is not anymore trouble.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In criminal law when someone does a wrong its called a crime. In civil law its called a ?
enot [183]

Answer:

Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crime and the legal punishment of party responding is called the defendant and the process is called litigation

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe three earlier types of corporal punishment used to correct offenders, and identify the goals of each.
    9·1 answer
  • The party who files a complaint against another party in a court of law is referred to as ___
    10·2 answers
  • Explain the difference between Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and Property
    7·2 answers
  • The type of government we have in the United State. A government
    5·2 answers
  • Misdemeanors are less severe crimes? ­­­­­­­­­­­­T/F
    8·2 answers
  • There is NO over lap of Law Enforcement responsibilities between all the different Lw Enforcement agencies.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following can be a consequence of noncompliance with EEOC
    14·2 answers
  • Is the Senate in Canada democratic? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
    8·1 answer
  • Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between declaration and statement?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!