Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n=400 represent the random sample taken
X=59 represent number of defectives from the company B
estimated proportion of defectives from the company B
is the value to verify
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to verify if the true proportion of defectives is higher than 0.1 then the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Answer:
x=1
Step-by-step explanation:
5
−
3
x
=
x
+
1
Move all terms containing x to the left side of the equation.
5
−
4
x
=
1
Move all terms not containing x to the right side of the equation.
−
4
x
=
−
4
Divide each term by −
4 and simplify.
x
=
1
1/3+5/12=4/12+5/12=9/12=3/4 of guests choose meat
1-3/4=1/4 of guests are vegetarians
so
23 guests is 1/4 of all guests
23*4=92 all guests
8/x + 2 is equal to 8/4 + 2.
8/4 = 2
2 + 2 = 4
ANSWER: 4
The square on the hypotenuse is skew and impossible to visually validate. There's nothing to sum. It is a simple calculation to note that <span><span><span>32</span>+<span>42</span>=<span>52</span></span><span><span>32</span>+<span>42</span>=<span>52</span></span></span><span>, but its picture doesn't 'say' that the angle between the 3 and 4 sided square must be 90 degrees.
</span>