A- You will smell bad,have bad lungs,but the smell of smoke is nice
B- You get drunk and maybe die out of instant
D-(For Tony Lopez) JAIL ❤️
E- Bullying, Cyberbullying, Cybercrime, Cybersex, (Ext.)
C- the emigration of highly trained or intelligent people from particular country
F- You drown
Answer: they can both provide information about a family’s past
The correct answers are <span>delusion; despite clear contradictory evidence.
Answer 1: A delusion is an erroneous or unfounded belief that a person is convinced of. Delusions are beliefs that are usually fixed and firm in a person's mind. An example of a delusion is strongly believing and being convinced that someone is "out to get you" because of far-fetched scenarios and beliefs you have conjured up in your imagination (you arrived at this belief without any external evidence).
Answer 2: Another aspect of delusions is that they are firmly held despite </span><span>clear contradictory evidence. Let's consider the previous example again: You believe that someone is out to get you and you hold this belief with strong conviction even when there is no evidence supporting it. For instance the person you feel threatened by has not behaved or acted in any way to suggest that they might harm or hurt you.However, despite this, you still believe that he or she is out to get you.
In this way, </span><span>a delusion is an erroneous belief that is fixed and firmly held despite clear contradictory evidence. </span>
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
To make the south more industrialized like the north. after the Atlanta champagne and the south was destroyed including industry and economy, Lincoln wanted to rebuild the south to make it as equally successful as the north.
