Yes because if you simplify 11/16 you would not get 3/4. Or a bwtter way is if you times 4 by 4 to get 16 as a denominator, then multiply 3 by 4 it equals more than 11/16.
The experimental probability can be represented as a fraction of the number of times a five was not the result over the total number of times the cube was rolled.
The answer would be 288/350 or 144/175.
Answer:
satisfy both equations
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>First what I did was find how much each pound would cost per different package. </u>
<u>So starting off with the 3 pound package. I did 2.49 divided by 3 to find out how much each pound would weigh. </u>
2.49 / 3 = 0 . 83
<u>So each pound in the 3 pounded package would cost $0.83. </u>
<u>Now to see how much the 8 pound package would cost. Just like the 3 pound package I had to find how much each pound would weigh. So I divided 6.49 by 8. </u>
6.49 / 8 = 0.81125
<u>So looking at the results the 3 pound package would be the best option. You are getting more for less. </u>
<u />
HOPES THIS HELPS!
