Answer:
total weight of debt = 0.343 or 34.3%
Explanation:
stock's market value = 17,500 x $69 = $1,207,500
bond₁'s market value = $250,000 x 101.5% = $256,750
bond₂'s market value = $350,000 x 106.5% = $372,750
total market value of the firm = $1,837,000
weighted capital structure:
market value weight
stocks $1,207,500 0.657
bond₁ $256,750 0.140
bond₂ $372,750 0.203
total $1,837,000 1
total weight of debt = 0.343 or 34.3%
Answer:
16. d?
17. probably b
18. a
19. hmmmmmmmmmm c?
20. b
21. d
22. d
23. c
24. c
25. a
Explanation:
Should all be right? a few im iffy on.... it's been a while
Answer:
Broker
Explanation:
A licensed broker must dispaly his or her name boldly in their primary place of business at all times becasue it helps to identify a broker quickly as well as has gives confidence to customers to transact business with them.
Cheers.
Answer:
The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200
The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:
The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.
The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.
The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features
Explanation:
The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.
In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it with the annual rental income.
In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.
GRM for Oaks
GRM=$9000000/($550*140)
GRM =116.88
GRM for Palms
GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)
GRM =112.82
The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2
=114.85
Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)
=$8,269,200
Answer:
B. It would not shift the curve; it would be represented by moving from a point inside the curve toward the curve.
Explanation:
Here the falling in unemployment represents that there is a movement with respect to the resources that are fully employed.
In this the unemployment means that it could be occured inner side of the PPF but if there is an increase, so the point of the production would be moved inner of the PPF to the PPF
Therefore the option B is correct
