Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
Answer:
The answer is through legal redress known as Specific Performance.
Explanation:
A contract is an agreement between two or more people. It is legally binding and enforceable. Each individual must satisfy their separate obligations.
Since the contract has been signed. This means it is legally binding.
Since it is legally binding, the best course of action is to proceed to court of law.
In law, this known as Specific Performance. Specific Performance is a resolution used by competent court of law to order a party to perform a specific act like order the owner of the land to relinquish the land. Specific Performance is an equitable remedy.
Answer:
A lack of competition
Explanation:
Non = absence
competition = the act of competing in a event
Which means noncompetition would mean "a lack or a absence of competition."
Hope this helps.
In terms of establishing an account receivable billing policy
and procedure includes the determining or knowing the number the days that has
been done between billings because this is essential to know if the policy is
upheld and proper procedures is being done.
Answer:
$40 billion
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Amount spend by government = $4 trillion
Amount raised by Taxes = $3 trillion
Interest rate = 4%
Now,
The bonds to be raised by the government
= Amount spend by government - Amount raised by Taxes
= $4 trillion - $3 trillion
= $1 trillion
or
= $1000 billion
Therefore,
The interest paid by the government each year
= Amount of bonds × Interest rate
= $1000 billion × 0.04
= $40 billion
