Historians often rely on both primary and secondary sources when supporting an argument, since it's important to use secondary sources to put the argument in context, and primary sources in order to make an original point.
Answer: Okay so, if you think on the domestic level of things we come to the conclusion of armed assault, robbing, murders, and other federal crimes that we do not need to speak on
for the foreign affairs you may have a messed up trade or conflict between one another, you have terrorism and ward and spies gathering intell on american plans
Explanation:
i am very sorry if this is not correct the answers I gave were from only what i understood and not parenthetical evidence nor biased information.
Answer:
Correct answer is diary entries by President Carter
.
Explanation:
Third and fourth options are not correct as first of all textbook and encyclopedia are not a primary, but a secondary historical source.
On the other side, diary entries are the best primary source because are written sources from the perspective of someone who participated in certain events, in this case president Carter.
Second option is not correct option, but after the diary journal articles would be also important as are written in the period when certain events happened.
