The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the authors of the declaration partially succeeded in providing a perfectly unbiased account of the king's actions. However, when reading the text of the Declaration, you can notice some biased when using adjectives and sentences that describe the King of England's offenses to the American colonies.
For example, I want to share the following evidence from the text. The following excerpt of the Declaration: <em>"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."</em>
When you read it, you can notice the kinds of words Thomas Jefferson used to disqualify the decisions of the British government. Words lie "abuses," "usurpations," and "despotism," are strong words that were chosen by the framers of the Declaration to appeal to the emotions of the colonists.
<span>Good Morning!
The system adopted by Lowell and the Plantation system has several differences. Starting with the operating mode.
The first, and Lowell, was created for an industrialized productive model, while the plantation saw the export of primary products.
The plantation, unlike Lowell's model, had no intention of educating or even raising the quality of life of workers in any way possible.
The plantation was usually carried out by slave labor, while Lowell's system was based on wage labor. Hugs!</span>
Answer:
They moved west.
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the Iroquois MOVED WEST when the beaver population declined in the middle of the seventeenth century.
Initially, the Iroquois hunted for Beaver as a major source for fur production, which they trade with the European settlers. However, following the decline of the animal in the area of present-day New York, the Iroquois moved westward to hunt for more Beavers in the area of Ohio county.
<em>FIRESIDE CHATS is the answer</em>
