Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
Answer:
yes i have and
Explanation:
1 a 2 d 3 that thay are not alone and thay are more people there now 4 im a litle con fiused with this one but imma say that alonles has changed because there is 2 people insted of 1 because 1 is aloonenes but now there 2 people and not 1
<u>Answer:
</u>
Laws may display behavior that some feel is wrong, and it may act that some feel is right is a TRUE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Certain laws are subject to criticism owing to the unacceptability of some or all the provisions included in it.
- In some instances, some laws tend to favor a specific group of people over others. Such laws are deemed as good by the ones who the law favors and is criticized by the ones who the law does not favor.
I think it’s A I’m not sure for a fact tho but I’m 70% sure it’s A
Answer:For every football game there is a team that is expected to win by a certain number of points. In betting parlance, this is called the spread. If point spreads are accurate, we would expect about half of all games played to result in the favored team winning (beating the spread) and about half of all games to result in the team favored to not beat the spread. The accompanying data represent the results of 45 randomly selected games where a 0 indicates the favored team did not beat the spread and a 1 indicates the favored team beat the spread. Do the data suggest that sport books establish accurate spreads?
Explanation:
