A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
The external ear structure is called the Pinna.
The Pinna helps to channel sound waves into the ear.
Many animals have the ability to move their pinna towards the direction of sound.
I have attached an image of a dog's ear to show you the external structure called the Pinna.
I hope this helps! I'm happy to answer any other questions you might have :)
[Image sourced from: https://www.msdvetmanual.com/dog-owners/ear-disorders-of-dogs/ear-structure-and-function-in-dogs]
Explanation:
K.E = 1/2mv²
1/2 x 7.26 x 7.5²= 204.19j
Primary= peptide bonds
secondary= hydrogen bond
tertiary= weak bonds, hydrophobic, disulfide bridges, salt bridges
quaternary= between polypeptides