Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
Answer: Dissenting Opinion
-----
Usually when decision is written, justices can write a concurring opinion if they would like to add something to the decision or if they agree with the decision, but disagrees with the reasoning. On the other hand, if they do not agree with the majority (aka the decision), they can write a dissenting opinion.
Answer:
a baseball tradition
Explanation:
Functionalist theorists are individuals who adopt the functionalist view to explain things around them. This view makes these theorists see the interactions of our world in a systematic way, where several factors come together, each with its function generating a stable, cohesive and efficient system. According to this point of view, a functionalist theorist would justify the baseball pitcher's incentive to "brush back" a batter who homerated on his previous bat as a baseball tradition.
When there is more of a product, the price is lowered because the product is not in short supply. However, if there is very little of the product, the price will increase because it is harder to get one's hands on that product because of its scarcity.
