Answer:
D. Any advantage that one firm has will be short-lived.
Explanation:
With the three firms all producing the same product with similar resources in their production and distribution of their products, any advantage that a firm has over the others if any would not last long at all. This is because each firm is using similar technique in the same location. Hence, there's nothing special about one of the firms over the others.
Answer: The statement is <u>TRUE.</u>
Explanation: The theory of purchasing-power parity is an economic theory that tries to calculate the exchange rate between the currencies of two countries necessary so that the same basket of goods and services can be purchased in the currency of each one, that is, so that the purchasing power (or purchasing power) ) of both currencies is equivalent.
Based on the scenario above, it is suggested that Girard
practices the management by walking around. The MBWA or the management by
walking around is a style where the management uses this with their managers
wandering in the workplaces to check their employees.
Answer:
The answer is false
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, comparing the two firm and saying there will not reach into a conclusion to which firm is better manage is false, this is because the difference in debt is a result of better management, and this could be the cause of Firm A's higher profit margin. So the claim was false
