Answer:
The good is considered a necessity.
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand is a measure of the sensitivity of demand for a good or service to changes in the price of that product. We say that the price elasticity of demand is elastic when a percentage change in the price of this good has major impacts on demand. On the contrary, we say that the price elasticity of demand is inelastic when variations in the price of goods have little or no influence on demand.
Usually elastic goods are those that can be replaced, so that rising prices cause a drastic drop in demand that will flow to another product. For example, if the price of the burger rises, consumers may stop buying burgers and substitute pizza (assuming these products are substitutes). On the contrary, if the good is needed, it usually tends to be inelastic, that is, the price increase does not considerably decrease the demand, because consumers need this good. For example, medicines.
Answer:
Margin of safety is a principle of investing in which an investor only purchases securities when their market price is significantly below their intrinsic value. ... Alternatively, in accounting, the margin of safety, or safety margin, refers to the difference between actual sales and break-even sales
Explanation:
Trade offs are something in which there are two things and we choose one of them according to our own preference or need. This is and should be our personal decision, but when Corporations and Governments decide on what to choose between two things, there would might be a negative impact on someone's life. He might feel controlled by the corporations and governments. For example, if corporations of CNG decides with the government that it is better for consumers to use CNG than Petrol in their cars, and lowers taxes on CNG and encourage consumers to shift towards CNG, then this trade off will have an impact of being controlled by the big giants. The choice should be of consumer's. The consumer should be the one who will trade off between things who are preferable for him.
<span>You might be able to cope with future issues more easily this the correct answer. : )</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
1. True
Separation of record keeping for assets from custody over assets in custody over assets reduces theft and fraud . except in a case of collusion.
Fraud and theft of assets can be easily perpetrated and covered up when an individual combines the role.
2. False
Internal control focuses more on the internal operation of an organization rather than the external. Even though it can still be of impact in checking the excesses of external parties like the government agencies , but that is not its primary objective
3.True
Internal control's main objectives can be best accomplished when there is an operational system with managerial policies that protect waste , fraud and theft , being the major factors targeted to control
4.False
Separating the responsibility for a transaction between two or more individuals or departments is a major way of preventing creation of fictitious invoices and payment as it could have easily be detected if different individuals are involved in approval and payment of invoices.
