Answer:
d. The higher the risk, the lower the possible investment.
Explanation:
With regards to speculation, hazard can be characterized as the changeability of return. the contrast between real result and expected result can be called as hazard. In the given model, Sandy think about that there is a positive connection between the likelihood of hazard and returns. for example on the off chance that there is high hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is high. in the event that there is less hazard, the likelihood of getting returns is low.
Right now, likes to go with if the higher the hazard, the lower the potential ventures, in light of the fact that the inconstancy of profits is high. Means the financial specialist could conceivably get the profits, consequently they may like to go with certain and ensured returns than dubious more significant yields. In the region of ventures it is a typical inquiry to all, some may go with higher the hazard the lower the conceivable speculation.
Henceforth, the appropriate response is option D.
In the event that an announcement is there that the higher the hazard, the bigger the potential returns, it doesn't imply that the speculator gets more significant yields with his ventures. the odds are there to get more significant yields simultaneously there are a few issues moreover.
Answer:
d. If the manager invests in the additional project, residual income of the division will increase.
Explanation:
RI = Operating Income - (Operating Assets x Minimum Required Rate of Return)
with adding the additional project
Operating Income: $60000 +6000 =$66000
Operating Assets: $375000+$40000 =$415000
Residual income =$66000-14%*$415000 =$7900
Consider the attached information.
Answer:
c) a benefit corporation.
Explanation:
A benefits corporation is the corporation that creates a positive impact on the society and its well being. The directors and the officers of this corporation would operate the business with the similar authority and behavior as done in the traditional corporation but the decision impact affect not only the shareholders but also the employees, customers etc
So as per the given situation, the correct option is c.
Answer:
Yes, there is no need to change the eatings habits
Explanation:
Ari will maximize utility until
MU / P for both is equal in order to be at equilibrium
So, in this case,
For Hot dogs
= MU / P
where
MU is marginal utils, which is 20
P is Price, which is $2
So,
= 20 / $2
= 10
For Hamburgers
= MU / P
where
MU is marginal utils, which is 25
P is Price, which is $2.5
So,
= 25 / $2.5
= 10
Therefore, MU / P for hot dog = MU / P for Hamburger
Hence, there is not need to change the eatings habits.
Answer:
5.657%
Explanation:
Data provided:
Face value = $1,000
Current market price = $640
Time of maturity, t = 8 year
Now,
the compounding formula is given as:
Face value = Current amount × 
where,
r is the rate i.e pretax rate of debt
n is the number of times the interest is compounded i.e for semiannual n = 2
thus, on substituting the values, we get
$ 1,000= $ 640 × 
or
1.5625 = 
or
= 1.0282
or
r = 0.05657
or
pretax cost of debt = 0.05657 × 100% = 5.657%
