Answer:
B) 1153000
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment
Required
Number of households without computer in 2009
From the attachment, we have:
--- survey
--- proportion without computer
So, the actual number is:
<em>Hence: (B) is correct</em>
Answer:
Pam: $181
Amanda: $362
Julie: $452
Step-by-step explanation:
(What does Mike have to do with this problem?)
Let a = Amanda's pay
Let p = Pam's pay
Let j = Julie's pay
"Amanda made twice what Pam earned"
a = 2p
"Julie made $90 more than Amanda"
j = a + 90
j = 2p + 90
Pam earned p
Total salary
a + p + j = 2p + p + 2p + 90
Total salary
$995
2p + p + 2p + 90 = 995
5p = 905
p = 181
a = 2p = 2(181) = 362
j = 2p + 90 = 362 + 90 = 452
Answer:
Pam: $181
Amanda: $362
Julie: $452
Answer:
Occam’s razor theory.
Step-by-step explanation:
This theory is known as Occam’s razor theory.
It's a theory based on the principle whereby we give precedence to simplicity. It states that out of two competing theories, the one with the simpler explanation of an object should be embraced over the other. The reason is that the philosopher William of Ockham said that "objects are not meant to be multiplied beyond absolute necessity.”
This definition resonates with what is explained in the question.
Thus, the theory is as explained.
Answer:
-14.4<or=z
Step-by-step explanation:
-8-6.4or = z+6.4-6.4
-14.4_<z
